Avril lavigne picture frames dating
After reading that MTV article I did it: I listened to her music, read her blog, and watched her videos. It’s working ’cause Swift writes good songs and America is terrified that its children have been scarred by Britney Spears’s psychotic vagina and Miley Cyrus’s obnoxious adolescence.
Rather than choosing an established/evolved talent (Beyoncé) or a fresh potential revolutionary (Lady Gaga), the Grammys chose someone who, according to her lyrics, has spent her entire life waiting for phone calls and dreaming about horses and sunsets.
In lieu of retro-editing the post, I encourage you to see the few statements about Gaga contained herein in the context of that time and not let those statements distract you from the points I still stand by, which is everything I said about Taylor Swift.
Yesterday, looking for Daily Fix links, I came upon an MTV news piece by James Montgomery titled “Why You Shouldn’t Hate On Taylor Swift.” Fair enough — the hype cycle moves quickly these days and now is probably the opportune moment for someone to step up and captain the “backlash-to-the-backlash” train.
So let’s stop judging her work on children’s terms and excusing that giggly self-absorption as a folly of youth. Never was this bunnyrabbitchild persona more exploited than it was after the VMAs.
If Kanye had snatched that mike from Lady Gaga, she would’ve snatched it right back, called Kanye an asshole (he is), admitted he was right (he was), and the whole thing would’ve been done and DONE.
If you’re one of those mothers who insist on conservative role models who compose girl-bashing boy-crazy rain-soaked anthems and you value a starlette’s “purity” over intelligence or even raw singing talent, then fine; better Taylor than Bristol Palin or G-d forbid, her mother. The article claims this “hating” on Taylor is another nasty result of the internet’s “secure blanket of anonymity” — that people hate on Taylor because.
That’s silly, ’cause the “hating” he describes comes from identified Facebook users and identified journalists. His other primary theory for why everyone “suddenly” is “hating” on Taylor is that post-#kanyeshrug, Taylor earned “bona fide mainstream celebrity” status which made her vulnerable to corresponding widespread attack and criticism. ” at the teevee, and, as if on cue, Hennessey-shitfaced Kanye popped up on stage to speak my mind and consequently kill his reputation. See, I don’t like dwelling in negativity, nor do I enjoy vilifying anyone besides politicians & Ilene Chaiken.
Mothers love this package, and teenage girls are hypnotized by her simple songs and pretty hair and propensity for crying on her instruments. When Beyoncè was Swift’s age, she was onstage with Destiny’s Child, proclaiming: It goes without saying — because, of course, no one wants to say it — that Swift was able to succeed so early ’cause her family was both supportive & wealthy enough to enable her ambitions.Until there’s evidence Swift can sing live, she’s not qualified as a musician.Why does Swift seem, at 20, a decade younger than Lady Gaga?But his argument is so off point I wondered if he’d picked this topic or if the unprovable thesis had been assigned to him. For starters, no one has been “hating on Taylor” — as I understand it, they’ve been hating on Taylor Swift the Product and, as of late, her accumulation of Important Awards.See, there’s nothing to about Taylor Swift the human.