Who developed the radiocarbon dating method
For his leadership, Libby received the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 1960.
The field of radiocarbon dating has become a technical one far removed from the naive simplicity which characterized its initial introduction by Libby in the late 1940's.
Thus, it is possible (and, given the Flood, probable) that materials which give radiocarbon dates of tens of thousands of radiocarbon years could have true ages of many fewer calendar years. The shells of live freshwater clams have been radiocarbon dated in excess of 1600 years old, clearly showing that the radiocarbon dating technique is not valid.
The shells of live freshwater clams can, and often do, give anomalous radiocarbon results.
Together, the methods contribute to the production of a timescale for events throughout the Quaternary, whether they cover a few million years or a few decades.
These methods are briefly summarized in terms of their initial inception and key advances in technique development, and they are illustrated by a limited number of applications.
I am not aware of any authentic research which supports this claim.Some of these, such as radiocarbon and potassium argon dating, have been around for more than 50 years and are widely accepted.Other methods, such as those based on cumulative effects of radioactive decay, have been around for somewhat less time.It is, therefore, not surprising that many misconceptions about what radiocarbon can or cannot do and what it has or has not shown are prevalent among creationists and evolutionists - lay people as well as scientists not directly involved in this field.In the following article, some of the most common misunderstandings regarding radiocarbon dating are addressed, and corrective, up-to-date scientific creationist thought is provided where appropriate. Radiocarbon is used to date the age of rocks, which enables scientists to date the age of the earth.